How I Made $1,140 in One Month on Medium By Writing Technical Articles

My Actual Journey of making writing as my second stream of income, sharing my practical and working system with you.

In April 2025, I opened my Medium Partner Program dashboard and saw $1,140.60 in story earnings.

I took a screenshot. Obviously.

Want the full process?

I created The Medium Income Playbook, a concise and actionable guide containing my topic-research process, prompts, templates, checklists, publication workflow, and a 30-day execution plan.

https://topmate.io/techbynehagupta/2218326?coupon_code=launch_offer

Launch price: ₹199 until this month end
Regular price: ₹499

It was not my average. It did not become my new monthly baseline. I currently make somewhere between $60 and $100+ in a typical month, partly because I am no longer publishing as regularly as I was back then.

So why share the $1,140 month now?

Because enough time has passed for me to look at it without confusing one great result with a permanent breakthrough.

If you think all this is bluff, you can go to my profile and read all the stories I am mentioning in this article Neha Gupta.

Two articles caused the spike

Most of that month’s income came from two stories.

One examined why some companies and developers were reconsidering Next.js. The other questioned the way developers usually write Dockerfiles.

I did not publish either article knowing it would take off. I had no secret setting, guaranteed formula, or insider knowledge about Medium’s algorithm.

What I did have was timing.

Developers were already discussing both subjects. They had questions, disagreements, and genuine concerns. I entered those conversations while people were actively looking for answers.

That mattered. But the story did not begin in April.

At last of this Article, I have shared a playbook containing my personal experience of How I built a second stream of income via medium

The six quiet months came first

I started publishing consistently around October 2024. For roughly six months, I wrote, experimented, and slowly learned what people wanted to read.

At one point, I tried to publish every day.

Daily publishing sounds impressive until you actually attempt it alongside work, research, editing, and everything else in life. I do not think writers should trade useful ideas for an unbroken publishing streak.

Still, writing frequently helped me.

I tested different titles. I saw which topics disappeared without a trace and which ones brought comments. I learned that an idea I found interesting was not automatically an idea readers cared about.

Most importantly, I was not starting from zero when the two successful stories arrived. I had already built a small base of followers and subscribers.

That made the spike more useful.

Reality check: Every story will not go viral. Most will not. No method can guarantee $1,000 — or any other amount — in Medium earnings. A better goal is to keep improving the probability that the right reader finds something genuinely useful in your work.

How I choose Topic to write on?

My research often begins with Google Trends, but it does not end there.

I move between Medium, YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, technical news, and developer communities. I am not merely hunting for a keyword with an upward graph. I am trying to understand the conversation surrounding it.

• Are people asking the same question repeatedly?
• Are they confused, frustrated, or divided?

Have existing articles explained the issue properly, or are they repeating identical surface-level points?

The Next.js article worked because it touched a real concern. Developers were not simply asking what Next.js could do. They were asking whether learning and depending on it would remain a sensible decision.

That question carried uncertainty — and uncertainty creates curiosity.

But a trend is only an opening. If the article says nothing beyond what readers have already seen in ten social media posts, timing will not rescue it.

Some of my best topics began as annoying bugs

Not every worthwhile idea appears on a trends dashboard.

Some arrive while I am stuck.

I once struggled to implement meta tags for a particular situation. I found plenty of resources, but none clearly solved the problem in front of me. Eventually, after testing different approaches, I got it working.

Then I documented the solution.

People found that article because they were stuck in the same place.

This is one of the biggest advantages practitioners have. While building things, we collect material constantly:

• Bugs that took far too long to diagnose
• Documentation that left out one crucial step
• Approaches that seemed correct but failed
• Decisions with uncomfortable trade-offs
• Small fixes that saved hours later

These experiences may not look like “content ideas” at first. Often, they are better than whatever happens to be trending that week.

A generic explanation can tell readers what a tool does. Experience can tell them where it breaks, what the documentation overlooks, and what to try when the obvious solution fails.

Where AI fits into my process

I use tools such as ChatGPT, but I do not expect them to write a complete article for me.

I may use AI to explore title directions, test hooks, organize rough notes, or identify questions I have not answered. I still decide which angle is worth pursuing. I verify technical claims. I remove suggestions that sound clever but say very little.

The final piece needs my reasoning, examples, and judgment. Otherwise, I am publishing a polished collection of sentences without giving readers a reason to trust them.

Titles deserve similar care.

I usually want a title to contain two things: a subject people can recognize or search for, and a question, tension, or unexpected result that makes them curious.

Curiosity helps. Exaggeration does not.

If a headline promises something the article itself cannot deliver, it may win the click but lose the reader.

The audience mattered more than one payout

Yes, earning $1,140.60 felt good.

But that month not only gave me money, but it also gave me people who wants to engage with my content, who subscribed for my newsletters.

That changed how I looked at Medium. I’ll be honest with you I also started on this platform to make money, but slowly and gradually writing became an important part of my life.

The viral month eventually ended. The people who discovered my work because of it did not all disappear with the spike.

That is the part worth building for.

What I could not reasonably include here

There is much more behind the process: how I shortlist and evaluate ideas, research technical claims, develop titles, structure the opening, work with publications, create a realistic writing schedule, and connect free content with a useful paid product.

Trying to squeeze the entire system into one article would either make this story exhausting or reduce each step to generic advice.

So I organized the complete workflow separately.

Build yourself a second income today

https://topmate.io/techbynehagupta/2218326?coupon_code=launch_offer

The guide does not promise that you will make $1,140. but it can surely help you build a steady stream of income.

It gives you the process I would follow if I were building my Medium from scratch : finding more relevant ideas, writing more useful articles, reaching the right readers, and turning occasional attention into something that lasts.

From Tech By Neha Gupta

• ‼️ Download the Medium Income Playbook here
• 👏 Enjoyed the article? Don’t forget to leave a clap.
• 💬 Have thoughts or questions? Share them in the comments.